Pages

Friday, October 16, 2009

Another racist incident

I was reading today in Slate, the political on-line magazine, about the Justice of the Peace in Louisiana who refused to give a marriage license to an interracial couple.  As some of Slate's readers commented, one wonders whether his refusal is in fact legal under prevailing law, but I think that issue is less important than the underlying racism that led him to refuse to do his duty towards that couple.   Many of the readers who commented in Slate expressed varying degrees of shock, surprise, rejection and dismay at the fact of it.

We should not any of us be surprised or shocked by this news from Louisiana.  Nor should we use this incident to tar the image of Louisiana.  I know there are many in Louisiana who are not racists and who would never support this kind of behavior on the part of a local public official.   This kind of racist sentiment displayed by the JP there can be found all over the US, and not just in southern states.  But I am absolutely convinced that it does not represent more than a minority, fringe part of our nation, and I believe that the election of Obama in November 2008 amply demonstrates that the vast majority of our country is moving in a totally different direction.  But we must never think that the problem is resolved by the fact that our President is Barack Obama.   Intolerance in our public discourse has grown considerably in the last decades, and our political leaders, particularly in the Republican Party have worked hard to exploit our different opinions and beliefs to promote their own political fortunes.   The intolerance is not only about racial issues, but about political philosophy, ideas of social justice, and about sexual orientation, among many others.

There has been an appalling failure of moral leadership from our political class in the widespread exploitation of our differences to gain a political foot up on the opponent.  It grew to its worst extreme so far with the elections in 2000 and 2004 with the political strategies devised by men such as Karl Rove who long ago lost his moral compass and who hides behind his political philosophy to justify his actions.   But I digress.  The saddest aspect of this situation has been the silence of the vast majority of our political leaders in both parties  before these political tactics that have so severely and dangerously divided our nation.  I am referring here not only to our executives (President, governors, mayors) but also to our legislative respresentatives at the federal and state levels.    We have always had political fault lines and political differences and we should expect that we always will.  But the lack or moral responsability on the part of our political candidates is shocking and disappointing to anyone who has followed the history of our nation.

Since the late 1990's, this corruption of our political morality has extended to our judiciary, especially to the federal courts and our Supreme Court.  Disgracefully, our leaders and legislators have since the second Clinton administration in particular politicized the nomination of our judges to the detriment of justice in our country.  We can see evidence of the intolerance I bemoan here in the workings of our Supreme Court, as the findings our the justices increasingly are guided by political and social philosophy to the exclusion of legal reasoning, which must be the foundation and bedrock of their decisions if justice is to be served.

The strength of America has always been its diversity, and now our politicians, especially in the Republican Party, have turned that virtue of diversity on its head and have succeeded in turning Americans against one another by exploiting our differences and stoking our fears and insecurities in this insecure world in which we live.   We used to agree to disagree and worked within the context of our democratic practices and principles to find ways to live and work together and to tolerate willingly and openly our differences. The quality of our political leadership, not only in the Presidency but even more so in Congress and in the Supreme Court has fallen in recent decades and the result is the current climate of fear and intolerance that our politicians have stoked. We must continue to seek and elect leaders who promote openness, tolerance, and a willingness to work even with those with whom they disagree to resolve the problems and difficulties our country faces.
Blogged with the Flock Browser

Another racial incident - in Louisiana

I was reading today in Slate, the political on-line magazine, about the Justice of the Peace in Louisiana who refused to give a marriage license to an interracial couple.  As some of Slate's readers commented, one wonders whether his refusal is in fact legal under prevailing law, but I think that issue is less important than the underlying racism that led him to refuse to do his duty towards that couple.   Many of the readers who commented in Slate expressed varying degrees of shock, surprise, rejection and dismay at the fact of it.

We should not any of us be surprised or shocked by this news from Louisiana.  Nor should we use this incident to tar the image of Louisiana.  I know there are many in Louisiana who are not racists and who would never support this kind of behavior on the part of a local public official.   This kind of racist sentiment displayed by the JP there can be found all over the US, and not just in southern states.  But I am absolutely convinced that it does not represent more than a minority, fringe part of our nation, and I believe that the election of Obama in November 2008 amply demonstrates that the vast majority of our country is moving in a totally different direction.  But we must never think that the problem is resolved by the fact that our President is Barack Obama.   Intolerance in our public discourse has grown considerably in the last decades, and our political leaders, particularly in the Republican Party have worked hard to exploit our different opinions and beliefs to promote their own political fortunes.   The intolerance is not only about racial issues, but about political philosophy, ideas of social justice, and about sexual orientation, among many others.

There has been an appalling failure of moral leadership from our political class in the widespread exploitation of our differences to gain a political foot up on the opponent.  It grew to its worst extreme so far with the elections in 2000 and 2004 with the political strategies devised by men such as Karl Rove who long ago lost his moral compass and who hides behind his political philosophy to justify his actions.   But I digress.  The saddest aspect of this situation has been the silence of the vast majority of our political leaders in both parties  before these political tactics that have so severely and dangerously divided our nation.  I am referring here not only to our executives (President, governors, mayors) but also to our legislative respresentatives at the federal and state levels.    We have always had political fault lines and political differences and we should expect that we always will.  But the lack or moral responsability on the part of our political candidates is shocking and disappointing to anyone who has followed the history of our nation.

Since the late 1990's, this corruption of our political morality has extended to our judiciary, especially to the federal courts and our Supreme Court.  Disgracefully, our leaders and legislators have since the second Clinton administration in particular politicized the nomination of our judges to the detriment of justice in our country.  We can see evidence of the intolerance I bemoan here in the workings of our Supreme Court, as the findings our the justices increasingly are guided by political and social philosophy to the exclusion of legal reasoning, which must be the foundation and bedrock of their decisions if justice is to be served.

The strength of America has always been its diversity, and now our politicians, especially in the Republican Party, have turned that virtue of diversity on its head and have succeeded in turning Americans against one another by exploiting our differences and stoking our fears and insecurities in this insecure world in which we live.   We used to agree to disagree and worked within the context of our democratic practices and principles to find ways to live and work together and to tolerate willingly and openly our differences. The quality of our political leadership, not only in the Presidency but even more so in Congress and in the Supreme Court has fallen in recent decades and the result is the current climate of fear and intolerance that our politicians have stoked. We must continue to seek and elect leaders who promote openness, tolerance, and a willingness to work even with those with whom they disagree to resolve the problems and difficulties our country faces.
Blogged with the Flock Browser

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Looking back - an unpublished post fro 2009

I have been following the progress of the legislation in Congress with great interest, and as they get closer to finalizing the legislation in the Senate, it becomes more than apparent that the Republicans and other elements in the political and lobbying scene in Washington are getting desperate and are doing their best to create confusion and sew discord about what President Obama and our Congress are trying to do.

Last Friday the Republican Senator from South Carolina Jim DeMint declared in a meeting with special interests opposing this health care reform that this project will be Obama's Waterloo and if they succeed in defeating the reform, it will break him. As the President pointed out later in a press conference, this reform is not about Obama, no it is about politics as usual. We must not allow the special interests who profit from the current situation to confuse us and deter us from achieving this much needed reform.

Our health care system is not working the way it should. We spend more than any other developed nation on health care and our health care outcomes are not the best of any developed nation. The cost of both health care and health insurance are increasing at more than three times the general inflation and we cannot afford to continue at this pace. It is breaking the economies of our families and our businesses. It is creating a situation where solely because of the cost of health care insurance high tech companies and others are outsourcing jobs offshore because they cannot support the cost of providing health care to these employees and still be competetive in this global economy.

We must find a way to control this problem before it spirals completely out of control. Can we in good conscience as a country continue to accept that we have more than 47 million citizens who have no health care insurance at all? Who cannot afford to provide care to their children? Who cannot afford to care for themselves until a health problem converts to a health crisis that must be attended in the emergency room? I think we as a nation are better than that.

We cannot let the Republicans and their special interest allies among the large hospital groups, health insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies continue to increase our health care costs with no relation to their own costs, but rather to their need for ever larger profits.

One of the most confusing arguments being presented now by the opponents of this reform is that it will lead to "rationing" of health care by bureaucrats. We must recognize this as a smoke screen designed to confuse our citizens and distort the arguments for reform. Our health care system as it is rations health care on the base of wealth. Those who can afford to buy health insurance, those who work in larger companies who can pool risks and self-insure, and those who can afford to pay for their own health care receive what they need and those less fortunate do not receive the health care or medicines they need because they are rationed by the wealthy special interests in this country.

Do not be fooled by these false arguments about rationing. Is it preferable to have decisions about access to health care be made by experts working for the government who are committed to providing health care for all citizens or by wealthy special interests who want to ration access to health care to provide only to those who can afford it in order to maximize their own profits? As it is, health insurance companies cherry-pick the most healthy from our population to offer insurance to and exclude those with the most serious problems, to avoid cutting into their profits.

Let's not be fooled into entering into a fruitless debate about rationing when there is such a pressing need to reform the way our health care system works so that all citizens have adequate access to the health care they need. We need to get behind this project and I urge all of you who might read this blog to contact your Senator and Congressman and urge them in no uncertain terms to pass this crucial legislation this year without fail. We owe it to ourselves, our children, and our fellow citizens.

Sunday, April 5, 2009

Holy Week - Holy cow it's getting late!

Holy Week is upon us here in this Catholic country and work mostly slows down and stops by the end of next week, before Easter. Our grandchildren should be visiting this week, though the two oldest are no longer frequent visitors - being 15 and 13, they have their friends and parties and soccer games and such and here in the country there's none of that.

Ever suffered from procrastination? Since I had a minor heart episode a few years ago, this has crept up on me and it has become a struggle to rid myself of it. In younger and workaholic years, there was none of that, but after having to take it easier for the better part of a year, I lost that impulse and haven't found a suitable replacement so far. It often leads to disappointment, both with myself and with my family, friends, and colleagues. This is the year to put it behind me for good, for I have much to do and time never seems to be sufficient.

Writing is my favorite vocation and I make all too little time for it. I am betting that committing to this blog will be a first step, to be followed by larger steps dedicating time and loving effort to my writing. Though I cannot honestly say that I hear footsteps, I know that I have less time than before and want to use the time I have to do the things I love. Surely this will lead me to sacrificing the television, which has always been a weakness of mine that I have struggled to control.

Well, all of a sudden it's six in the morning and I still have not slept in my own bed. Signing off for now.

Friday, April 3, 2009

Opening burst - first post but unpublished till now

We try to be true to ourselves, but often something seems to impede us from doing so. Some are born sure of themselves and seem somehow incapable of self-doubt at any serious level. Then there are those of us who live with existential doubts and from time to time it seems to get the better of us. Especially as we get a little older. It becomes more difficult plunge forward without doubting ourselves at some level. But I truly believe that we need to take chances and ultimately to bet our lives. With this I aim to open a dialog with myself and anyone else who is interested in entering this dialog. All comers are welcome. Themes will not all be existential, of course, as that is too tiring. Politics is interesting, especially these days. Then some days it's just fascinating to observe those around us and those far from us and make a stab at understanding them.